Click here to purchase photos
Find us on Facebook
Changing tests doesn’t necessarily mean ‘improvement’
by Alex Saitta
20 months ago | 469 views | 0 0 comments | 5 5 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Editor, The Progress:

At the April Pickens County school board meeting our schools were presented the state Gold and Silver awards. In 2010, 23 Gold and Silver awards were handed out and there was a discussion about the significant increase from 2009, when only 13 were awarded.

In middle and elementary school, Gold and Silver awards are based on PACT and now the PASS test.

The discussion centered around the question, was there improvement in academic performance or was the standardized test made easier when it was switched from PACT to PASS?

The point I made was when you look beyond the awards and at the raw test data for the PASS, there wasn’t improvement in our scores.

One way to get improvement in test results without actual improvement in academic performance is to lower the test’s cut scores. For example, let’s say a student needed 70% of the questions right to pass the test. To improve the results, the pass/ fail threshold or cut score could be lowered to 65 percent.

When the state changed from the PACT to the PASS this past year, the cut scores were lowered and that explains why there were so many Gold and Silver awards in 2010 vs. 2009, even though the test data didn’t show an improvement.

To prove the point I went to the South Carolina Education Oversight Committee website and it clearly states the PASS’s cut scores were lowered. I quote from the study:

"Proficiency cut scores under PACT were at or among the most difficult of all states examined, while the newly proposed PASS cut scores are much lower, falling roughly among the lowest one fourth of states examined."

"Use of these lower standards would result in dramatic increases in the percentages of students meeting standards in South Carolina schools, even with no actual improvement in student performance."

In sum, South Carolina switched from one of the toughest grading scales to one of the easiest.

I understand the desire to somewhat lower the grading scale when the state switched from the PACT to the PASS – it was near the top. However, to drop it to one of the lowest was wrong. Also, to have it trigger all these extra awards and not to explain this to the public was misleading.

Editor's note: The writer is a trustee for the School District of Pickens County.

Comments
(0)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
No Comments Yet
report abuse...

Express yourself:
We're glad to give you a forum to air your point of view on issues important to this community. We just ask that you keep things civil. Leave out the personal attacks. Do not use offensive language, ethnic or racial slurs, or assail anyone's personal or religious beliefs. For anyone who can't be civil, we reserve the right to remove your material. We also reserve the right to ban users who violate our visitor's agreement.
Weather
Sponsored By:

Lottery
Sponsored By:

Stocks
Sponsored By:

featured businesses
Gasoline Prices
Sponsored By:

Recipes
Sponsored By: